This corruption and overthrow of the EU Judicial System, and EU Legislative Bodies in the EU has occured within 5, FIVE short years. We have an article entitled "Lawfare" as well as others speaking to Muslims using laws, and regulations in the EU against the EU and member nations as a means of overthrowing the EU judicial system.
We remind our readers that this same thing is afoot in the US
Selective suppression of free speech
that condemns militant “Islam” allows few other explanations
January 16 2010
by Bill Levinson
Let me tell you, Cassius, you
Are much condemn’d to have an itching palm
To sell and mart your offices for gold
Free Speech Has Died in
Europe reports that
MP Jesper Langballe: I Confess provides additional details:
On December 3, 2010 the
municipal court in
Under Danish jurisprudence it is immaterial whether a statement is true or untrue. All that is needed for a conviction is that somebody feels offended.
We have by the way forwarded this link to Freedom House with the suggestion
that it reconsider
In any event, why would Danish legislators introduce and enact a law that
makes it illegal to speak the truth, and why would members of the Danish
judiciary enforce such a law? Furthermore, why are these
laws not enforced against militant “Muslims” who engage not only in hate speech
but violent threats? Note at 2:20 that a jihadist expresses a wish that
(1) Judicial and prosecutorial substitution of extremist ideology for rule
of law and common sense
(2) Judicial and prosecutorial incompetence
(3) Subornation of judges, prosecutors, or legislators by the militant “Muslims” who claim to be offended; how else could it be made illegal to speak the truth? There is no doubt that the German-American Bund would have been delighted to bribe Members of Congress to make criticism of Nazism similarly illegal, and furthermore that Nazi Germany actually did so. That was why Hans and Sophie Scholl were executed, along with several other members of the White Rose Society.
On April 27 a Dutch judge ruled that Hirsi Ali had to abandon her highly secure house at a secret address in the Netherlands: her neighbors had complained that living next to her was an unacceptable security risk to them, although the police had testified in court that it was one of the safest places in the country due to the large number of personnel they had assigned there.
Jean Marie Le Pen, runner-up in
the 2002 presidential election, was convicted of inciting racial hatred for
comments made to Le Monde in 2003 about the consequences of Muslim immigration
The consequences of Muslim immigration in
Whenever a judge, prosecutor, or legislator begins to do things that defy rational explanation, we need to take a close and hard look at the potential reasons. As an example, the Wilkes-Barre Times-Leader reported a few years ago that Judge Mark Ciavarella was convicting juvenile defendants and sending them to juvenile detention facilities for minor offenses, and also that he had discouraged them from bringing lawyers. We thought this was unusual, local legislators thought it was unusual, and the public as a whole thought it was unusual. The problem was that nobody did anything; everybody assumed that if the juveniles had been wronged, they or their parents would have said something to the state’s judicial conduct board. It was also assumed that local defense attorneys who were aware of the same information would have at least reported this irregular conduct. In retrospect, the public made a serious mistake by assuming that somebody was supervising this judge and his colleague Michael Conahan.
WILKES-BARRE, Pa. — For years, the juvenile court system in Wilkes-Barre operated like a conveyor belt: Youngsters were brought before judges without a lawyer, given hearings that lasted only a minute or two, and then sent off to juvenile prison for months for minor offenses. …In one of the most shocking cases of courtroom graft on record, two Pennsylvania judges have been charged with taking millions of dollars in kickbacks to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers.
There we have the alleged (Ciavarella has yet to be convicted) explanation for this judge’s highly irregular actions–behavior every bit as unusual as that of European prosecutors who bring criminal charges against those who criticize militant “Islam” and European judges who even let these cases into court, much less rule favorably on them.