This is by far the greatest betrayal in a free
nation in the modern era. That
In many ways we see some of the same tactics being
employed by Democrats here in the US – The Lord’s blessing is truly with us as
the Liberals have not had a super majority for the last eight years to secretly
work all the mischieve they could against this nation and its people.
If by any means the fort can be held on Nationa Healthcare,
On Cap and Trade, and on whatever else is up the liberal /socialist’s sleeves –
come January of 2011 – the breach will be filled.
To us this represents much of what the bible speaks of in
Revelation about the madness that shall take the earth at the time of the
antichrist. It will be a day of great betrayal, against family, against people,
against nations.
In what we see here in Britain is hardly the work of the
illuminati, or the Rothchilds or the Builderbergers – it is the work of Liberal
Socialists who seek to make all of Europe one big happy socialist utopia,
beleiving that with all the industialization and capital that Europe has that
the new EU will be what Russia and China were never able to be – Marx’s shining
socialist light in the world.
However instead they have released the forces of hell
into their nations and peoples, that will devour all, break all in pieices and
then grind all into dust.
So now the cat is
well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to
Was it through a fit
of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all,
but deliberate?
The latter
explanation seemed just too outrageous. After all, a deliberate policy of mass
immigration would have amounted to nothing less than an attempt to change the
very make-up of this country without telling the electorate.
There could not have
been a more grave abuse of the entire democratic process. Now, however, we
learn that this is exactly what did happen. The Labour government
has been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural
sabotage.
This astonishing
revelation surfaced quite casually last weekend in a newspaper article by one
Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack
Straw and David Blunkett.
And it was he who
wrote a landmark speech in September 2000 by the then immigration minister,
Barbara Roche, that called for a loosening of
immigration controls. But the true scope and purpose of this new policy was
actively concealed.
In its 1997 election
manifesto, Labour promised 'firm control over immigration' and in 2005 it
promised a 'crackdown on abuse'. In 2001, its manifesto merely said that the
immigration rules needed to reflect changes to the economy to meet skills
shortages.
But all this concealed a monumental shift of policy. For
Neather wrote that until 'at least February last year', when a new points-based
system was introduced to limit foreign workers in response to increasing
uproar, the purpose of the policy Roche ushered in was to open up the UK to
mass immigration.
This has been achieved. Some 2.3million migrants have
been added to the population since 2001. Since 1997, the number of work permits
has quadrupled to 120,000 a year.
Unless policies
change, over the next 25 years some seven million more will be added to
Such an increase is
simply unsustainable.
It was therefore a
politically motivated attempt by ministers to transform the fundamental make-up
and identity of this country. It was done to destroy the right of the British
people to live in a society defined by a common history, religion, law, language
and traditions.
It was done to
destroy for ever what it means to be culturally British and to put another
'multicultural' identity in its place. And it was done without telling or
asking the British people whether they wanted their country and their culture
to be transformed in this way.
Spitefully, one
motivation by Labour ministers was 'to rub the Right's nose in diversity and
render their arguments out of date'.
Even Neather found
that particular element of gratuitous Left-wing bullying to be 'a manoeuvre too
far'.
Yet apart from this,
Neather sees nothing wrong in the policy he has described. Indeed, the reason
for his astonishing candour is he thinks it's something to boast about. Mass
immigration, he wrote, had provided the 'foreign nannies, cleaners and
gardeners' without whom
What elitist
arrogance! As if most people employ nannies, cleaners and gardeners. And what ignorance. The argument that
Neather gave the
impression that most immigrants are Eastern Europeans. But these form fewer than a quarter of all immigrants.
And the fact is that,
despite his blithe assertions to the contrary, schools in areas of very high
immigration find it desperately difficult to cope with so many children who
don't even have basic English. Other services, such as
health or housing, are similarly being overwhelmed by the sheer weight of
numbers.
But the most shattering revelation was that this policy
of mass immigration was not introduced to produce nannies or cleaners for the
likes of Neather. It was to destroy
A measure of
immigration is indeed good for a country. But this policy was not to enhance
British culture and society by broadening the mix. It was to destroy its
defining character altogether.
It also conveniently
guaranteed an increasingly Labour-voting electorate since, as a recent survey
by the Electoral Commission has revealed, some 90 per cent of black people and
three-quarters of Asians vote Labour.
In Neather's
hermetically sealed bubble, the benefits of mass immigration were so
overwhelming he couldn't understand why ministers had been so nervous about it.
They were, he wrote,
reluctant to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all to
Labour's core white working class vote. So they deliberately kept it secret.
They knew that if
they told the truth about what they were doing, voters would rise up in
protest. So they kept it out of their election manifestos.
It was indeed a
conspiracy to deceive the electorate into voting for them. And yet it is these
very people who have the gall to puff themselves up in self-righteous
astonishment at the rise of the BNP.
No wonder Jack Straw
was so shifty on last week's Question Time when he was asked whether it was the
Government's failure to halt immigration which lay behind increasing support
for the BNP.
Now we know it was no such failure of policy. It was
deliberate. For the government of which Straw is such a long- standing member
had secretly plotted to flood the country with immigrants to change its very
character and identity.
This more than any other reason is why Nick Griffin has gained so much support. According to a YouGov poll
taken after Question Time, no fewer than 22 per cent of British voters would
'seriously consider' voting for the BNP.
That nearly one
quarter of British people might vote for a neo-Nazi party with views inimical
to democracy, human rights and common decency is truly appalling.
The core reason is
that for years they have watched as their country's landscape has been
transformed out of all recognition - and that politicians from all mainstream
parties have told them first that it isn't happening and second, that they are
racist bigots to object even if it is.
Now the political
picture has been transformed overnight by the unguarded candour of Andrew
Neather's eye-opening superciliousness. For now we know that Labour politicians
actually caused this to happen - and did so out of total contempt
for their own core voters.
As Neather sneered,
the jobs filled by immigrant workers 'certainly wouldn't be taken by unemployed
BNP voters from Barking or
So that's how New
Labour views the white working class, supposedly the very people it is in
politics to champion. Who can wonder that its core vote is now decamping in
such large numbers to the BNP when Labour treats them like this?
Condemned out of its own mouth, it is New Labour that is responsible