This is a reprint of an article in The Madison Institute Newsletter, Fall Issue, 1894:


On the internet there has been some discussion to the authenticity of this document, early on it has circulated on the internet in collage servers as a joke were young people are especially promiscuous and since the document has been played as anti-Christian, Anti-Church Anti-God and Anti-bible for that reason alone it needs to be addressed powerfully as this has been and still is the image of all Calvinistic leaning bible believing Christians before the world. 


This document is so damning that quite a number of Christians have weighed in on this document universally denying that any of this has ever been said or enacted with church sponsorship these include some Evangelicals, Fundamentalists, and people that identify themselves as non-ordained untitled officials within one of several Methodist denominations. Among these none has acknowledged they are a pastor or any one higher in these organizations probably from fear of a backlash against them and their denomination. These have attacked this document on a number of levels first that the press: Spiritual Guidance Press can not be found or identified. In the early days of The days of the Pentecostal revival – it is a fact that almost all early records and all early tracts and writings have been lost. The names of these presses used were little more than a name, many of the early bible schools and churches from that revival no longer remain as they were rickety old buildings in the case of the church as Azusa street it was a horse stable and it caved in one night while the congregation danced in the spirit during the revival.  


Some years ago I was chronicling for Wade Taylor and Pinecrest articles from Elim’s early days (1919 sticks in my mind) through to the latter rain revival. Actually from its early days little or nothing exists it is only after a few decades that they began to save the Elim Pentecostal Heralds and with few exceptions all the tracts all the writings otherwise are lost. Likewise Pinecrest (1968) all that Pinecrest printed in its first five or so years 5 or so years 


The school EBI that Beuttler taught in and Wade Taylor was torn down decades ago not one stone remains and no plaque marks it and in the process of time the school will become lost. The bible school in Topeka Kansas in 1901 where the first person that century was recorded to receive the baptism of the Holy Ghost person nothing remains of that place or any of its writings or tracts or its location – it has become just a footnote. So the loss of records of the writer the fellowship or organization to which they belonged is not surprising and do not diminish what is spoken here no more than not knowing the author of the book of Hebrews diminishes the words in that book in the bible.


Concerning now objections to language used in the document it has been said that the word sex is a modern word and only came into use in recent decades – in a dictionary on word etymology  -- that is the origin of words the words sex sexual and sexuality have been in use for hundreds of years before this document was written. And historically these words were at that time been considered sophisticated as they were coined and used by people in the scientific community and by collage professors. Finally the use of turn out the lights is an oil lamp and gas light age term as oil lamps have a wick that is turned up or town down to turn off and gas lamps had a key that was turned to turn them of and light bulbs today bear the same terminology even though they are switched on and off.




Instruction and advice
for the young bride


First we need to mention that this was not a mere article or tract, demonstrating the rise of 19th century liberal feminism and its finding an entry point into Northeastern Methodism and other area bible believing denominations. This article was in fact a political manifesto for future liberal feminists, such as, Molly Yard, Gloria Steinem and Catharine MacKinnon who wrote in the 1990’s “All sex is rape.”  

This article also demonstrates not only the penetration in American evangelicalism and fundamentalism, but that by the 1880’s the poison of this Victorian/Anglican feminist thought was already working towards the complete overthrow of the consortium of these bible believing denominations.  In those days New York City was the most culturally decadent and liberal city the US.  In that day New York City was called the Paris of the US. So that for all too many bible-believing denominations with their leaders and elders were either residing in New York City or somewhere nearby, or their denomination having had at that time their largest and wealthiest churches in New York City and Vicinity – they leaned heavily upon the judgment ad teachings of these “Large successful preachers.” (This should sound strangely similar to populist errors and perversions that are  promoted by they mega churches and mega ministries of the day – that we have discussed on these web pages and if one were to go to the ancient writings page one would discover that this same identical thing occurred in the pre-Roman Catholic Church and the Roman Catholic Church  between 300 AD –500 AD until Augustine re-wrote and redefined Roman Catholic theology into more or less what we recognize as the foundation for all the heresies of the Catholic Church  from then till now. So a rule of thumb can be clearly established here that bug churches are generally so not because of truth – but because they preach populist puke – so to follow them and their teachings is not the rising road of righteousness but a downward spiral that leads to hell.  And the proof text of this is look at the Methodists today as well as the vast array of so-called evangelical seminaries and denominations today as recorded in article after article on this website and look at the overthrow of fundamentalist seminaries collages and bible schools and this great darkness creeping through now their churches and denominations. We prophesy that these very things shall shortly come to pass and even now are taking place unseen in Pentecostal and Charismatic bibles schools churches and denominations.  


Victorianism was the birthplace of modern feminism, and modern liberalism. In England Victorianism came into being with the “dominating” and “powerful” Queen Victoria and faded with her death and rise of new kings and queens. During the reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901) the women of England were inspired and encouraged by their Queen to take rule over their households. Also during this era legislation was passed in the House of Commons and Lords to see to it that the status of British women was permanently changed. And nowhere were these sweeping changes more apparent than in the Anglican Church that King Henry the 8th had placed at the beck and call of the British Throne.  During her 64 year reign Queen Victoria effectively changed the face of thee Gospel of the Anglican Church from one of being a Roman Catholic clone with “Patriarchal rule” to a NEW Gospel that extolled and promoted Victorian feminists “Matriarchal rule.” 


This in turn brought about a fundamental change in the Anglican church, which as all other churches before it had been a Church comprised of “households,” but with the coming of this Victorianized Anglicization the Church of England became one of fractured or sundered households ruled by women. 


In the NEW feminized Victorian doctrine the Anglican Church began teaching its women that they were all little “Saint Mary’s”, and that as these little “Saint Mary” there women innately born as all being “spiritual” and “holy” while all their husbands were all born inherently corrupt and unholy – and thus men only sought to drag these holy women down from their lofty perch into men world of sex, alcohol, and vice.  And so these Anglicized women were made “saints” within the Church and the high priests over their rather than their husband’s household and they also were deputized as religious police over the whole of society. 


On the other hand this had numerous effects on Victorianized males in Church, the household, and in society.


In a Church where there is a constant preaching of female moral superiority, and male depravity, and in such an atmosphere only men who are willing to have their lives sifted through, and are willing pay homage to their “elitist” Anglicized moral superiors – were rewarded with the title of “Gentile Man” the word come from the word Genteel.


Websters defines Genteel as:
Etymology: Middle French gentil gentle (So here we see the insertion in English an untranslated French word that has been ascribed new meanings.)
1 a : having an
(False) aristocratic quality or flavor : STYLISH b : of or relating to the gentry or (A wanna be) upper class  (That were neither bluebloods nor bore the credentials for such recognition) c : (A false) elegant or graceful in manner, appearance, or shape d : free from vulgarity or rudeness (Of the common people) : POLITE
2 a :
maintaining or striving to maintain the appearance of superior or middle-class social status or respectability (What we have here is Christ’s description of the Pharisees) b (1) :  (However these are a people like the ascetic Rabbis and sages of the Talmud that are) marked by false delicacy, prudery, or (and self) affectation


So to the obedient commoner husbands willing to take upon them their wife’s yoke upon them at the behest of queen Victoria -- the Anglican Bishops would bestow upon these gelded men the empty title of Gentleman.  And to the majority of these common men that would not conform to the image and likeness to their church going ladyship these Anglicized congregations would work in concert with the bishops to driven out and scattered these men so that they have become a prey.

Ezekiel 34:18-22 Seemeth it a small thing unto you to have eaten up the good pasture, but (that) ye must (also) tread down with your feet the residue of your pastures (before allowing those who you deem less spiritually than you to eat?)  and (Seemeth it a small thing unto you) to have drunk of the deep waters, but (that) ye must (also) foul the residue with your feet (before allowing those who you deem less spiritually than you to drink?)? And as for My flock (those who have been rejected and scattered), they eat that which ye have trodden with your feet; and they drink that which ye have fouled with your feet. Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD unto them; Behold, I, even I, will judge between (you) the fat cattle and between the lean cattle. Because ye have thrust with side and with shoulder, and pushed all the diseased with your horns, till ye have scattered them abroad; Therefore will I save my flock, and they shall no more be a prey; and I will judge between cattle and cattle.

The polar opposite of this is the Islam -- It is a paternal religion where they man is the absolute and unquestioned head of the Household.  – And despite all the evil that surrounds it  -- this is why it is so appealing to powerless and marginalized males in westernized society.  This is why I read that 100,000 white Europeans are converting to Islam every year. And not to recognize what even unsaved ex-feminists are prophesying concerning Feminism being the road to Islam for the whole of the EU and westernized society – Is to damn your children and your children’s children to war death enslavement and torture by Muslims. These things shall come to pass just as they were spoken by the Moses, the Prophets and Christ Himself and no matter what you confess or profess – unless you repent and become as a little child and that includes before your husband and take upon you the yoke of Christ and the yoke of your husband and teach your sons and daughters the way wherein they should walk –In the hour when these things come to pass you will not be hid in the secret place of hand of God but you will be in the hand of an angry God from which none can deliver.


So that men in Anglicized Churches do not want to go to a church where they receive unrelenting humiliation from the woman there and the ministry alike.  As men in an Anglicized western nation do not want to stay be married and be at home with malcontent women on whom the government heaps the rule and special powers over them laws and edicts that give these women the rule and special powers over them. To the place that they are publicly humiliated and excoriated for virtually anything they do or don’t do.


This effectively created within “Anglicized” churches congregations primarily filled with women.   And this effectively has created within “Anglicized” nations from sea to shining sea wives and children of disobedience and a never ending cycle of broken marriages and broken households.


In Anglicized/ Victorianized households the women not only rule and exercise unscriptural authority over men, and thereby sin against God, but these women go further unto the sin of Eve in the garden where they shall be as god and rule and judge as god and yet be judged of no one for doing so not even by God himself, as the seek to rise over their husband and all men and take the place of high priest.


The Lord Spoke to me a few days ago that this sin of even is the doctrine of predestination and the doctrine of eternal security – that these make ones actions as god and therefore they can be judged by no man even by god himself. When the Lord spoke these things I was blown away. Never ever could I have imagined such a thing --  and I can see how subtle this web of deceit has been woven.


Before I was born in response to this Victorianization of the household – men frequently also left their households for a night out with the boys. – And for close to 100 years an entire culture arose of men leaving households every evening to carouse with the boys. “Historically this was a new behavior among Churched households.” And after a few generations of living in this “sundered” environment (Being divorced while not being divorced) men en mass began to cast off this yoke of Anglicanization and /Victorianization began to fully divorce themselves from the disrespect and humiliation associated with their Victorianized households, and men even Christian men began in earnest seeking instead women that were not Anglicized and Victorianized.    


Another strong contingent of the Anglicanization of England was largely accomplished through the message of Anglican’s being a “Royal” and “Exalted” -- and therefore they had rule over the British unwashed and unsaved who were not.


Out of this the modern “Morality Code” was written so that the unwashed and unsaved with their “Unchristian like” behavior would not offend the virgin eyes and virgin ears of these “Royal” and “Exalted” Anglican women and their children.  So in effect the unsaved were legislatively required to act as if they were saved – or be punished for their brutish and boorish behavior.


Matriarchal Anglicanization also from the 1880’s Victorianism’s Anglicanization has found a permanent home in US Fundamentalism Evangelicalism, Pentecostalism, and Charismaticism.  Today we have a “church instituted” matriarchal society that has bread its own unique set of Talmudic doctrines and traditions over the teachings of Christ and the Apostles that rot the soul of the bible believing church and that have rendered them spiritually impotent.       

On the Conduct and Procedure
Of the Intimate and Personal Relationships
Of the Marriage State
For the Greater Spiritual Sanctity
Of this Blessed Sacrament
And the Glory of God

by Ruth Smythers
Beloved wife of The Reverend L.D. Smythers,
Pastor of the Arcadian Methodist Church
of the Eastern Regional Conference
Published in the year of our Lord 1894
Spiritual Guidance Press, New York City

Instruction and advice for the young bride
(From this point on black text and red text are from the article, and blue text are our comments)

To the sensitive young woman who has had the benefits of proper upbringing, (This enlightened and sophistication that comes with Victorian upbringing – train up a child . . .  and they shall not depart – this works both ways.) the wedding day is, ironically, both the happiest and most terrifying day of her life. On the positive side, there is the wedding itself, in which the bride is the central attraction in a beautiful and inspiring ceremony, (These are far reaching doctrinal statements) symbolizing her triumph in securing a male to provide for all her needs for the rest of her life. (We remind you this is a written with the full approval of one of the highest ranking Methodist preachers of the day – We see here the selfishness, the contempt and the utter disregard for the word of God.)  On the negative side, there is the wedding night, during which the bride must pay the piper, so to speak, by facing for the first time the terrible experience of sex.  (Terrible because as we have seen in the Talmud Sex was viewed as part of “The Evil Urge”(The evil urges being defined specifically as hunger, thirst, seeking shelter, and Sex.) The Sex of the Talmud was viewed as the sun-source of all defilement that would make Talmudic men, unclean unholy. Victorian Feminism flips that belief from being that women are all seductresses and adulteresses and that all sex with a man married and unmarried is “unclean”, “unholy,” to it is the males that are total leeches and utter perverts and that any sex in or out of marriage defiles and makes these little holy Saint Mary’s unclean.

Part of what is driving all of this is the Roman Catholic/Anglican Confessional in which woman’s sexual practices and thoughts were scrutinized and confessed aloud as sins after which the priest would outline means of cleansing one from these venial and mortal sins.  Methodists were originally all converted Anglicans, who in turn were all converted Roman Catholics. We mention this to point out that the Talmudic teachings that all sex is sin teachings and beliefs were deeply ingrained in all British pre-Victorian society. And what Victorian society did was to flip the guilt from the woman to the man just as in the Talmudic Koran the sin and guilt of all gentiles is flipped to guilt and sin of all Jews.

At this point, dear reader, let me concede one shocking truth. Some young women actually anticipate the wedding night ordeal with curiosity and pleasure! (Only the poorest and most ignorant of women could hold such unsophisticated views) Beware such an attitude! A selfish  (Here we see a redefinition of a man desiring sex as one who is sinful selfishness) and sensual (The writer now evokes the biblical phrase “earthly sensual and devilish” directing it towards husbands) husband can easily take advantage  of (Youthful emotions of ) such a bride. One cardinal rule (Here the writer appeals to Catholic terminology to give her words more bite) of marriage should never be forgotten: GIVE LITTLE, GIVE SELDOM, AND ABOVE ALL, GIVE GRUDGINGLY. (First the writer previously redefines any man desiring sex as selfishness – She now defines any act that is little seldom and grudgingly done by a woman as “Giving” as if it is some great act of “selfless grace.”) 

Victorian/feminism is the core of the modern matriarchal/ feministic marriage. It begins with all sex is unclean perverse and filthy, but this same attitude pervades in every area of the marriage and household governance. The Victorian wife is the lawgiver the husband is a taker or robber.  The Victorian wife is the budget keeper, the husband with the purse strings lavishes only upon himself and his own lusts.  The Victorian wife spiritual guide and high priest of the house, the husband is the source of all immorality and gross unbelief etc. – and in all this we can see in Victorian/Anglicanization that the church their message of Royal and Exalted rule of the Church and it’s female laity over the unwashed and unsaved men. And we can well see here how this better “mouse trap” found such a note in British and American women – the message here is so powerful that today agnostic, atheist, humanist, feminist, communist, and lesbian, women all powerfully embrace and profess this message of Victorian Anglicanization. For they above the millions of blinded bible believing church going women that have been sucked into this as a false path to purity and holiness have discerned the true anti-God anti-church anti-family, and anti-bible anti –Christian and anti-Jewish message that was and is hidden in these perverted teachings.

And the fruits of these “works of darkness’ is it has almost brought about the end of a church of households, by promoting a church of fractured households, and churches and congregations of women which we see in 75-80 percent of all Evangelical, Fundamentalist, Pentecostal and Charismatic Church in this day, with all of these women made to believe that they were all little Saint Mary’s. Though in bible believing circles it can not be spoken of in those Anglican and catholic terms, it is none the less exactly this Victorian/ talmudic point of view that is supported and encouraged by every bible believing pastor and ministry to this day. This is deeply ingrained to this day in all Evangelical Fundamentalist Pentecostal and Charismatic churches that women publicly and freely deride their husbands as being sinful corrupt and unholy while they themselves are the paragon of what it is to be faithful to their Pastor and their respective Church.

In Talmudic conservative Roman Catholicism, Talmudic Islam and Talmudic Judaism we see the exact opposite with an oppressive and corrupt male domination – that is also is wholly anti-God, wholly anti-bible, wholly anti-Jewish, and wholly anti-Christian. ) Otherwise what could have been a proper (Victorian/feminist) marriage could become an orgy of sexual lust. (The implication here is sex in marriage is lustful depraved and demonic in its activity – this is largely an Augustinian  Catholic/  Gnostic/ and Talmudic Judaism doctrine.)

On the other hand, the bride's terror need not be extreme. While sex is at best revolting (disgusting and utterly contemptible) and at worse rather painful, (This is due to this deluded woman’s unbiblical sexual practices which she will describe below in some detail) it has to be endured, (Suffered as Saint Mary) and has been by women since the beginning of time, (The implication here is it was so since the “fall of man” and the writer is ascribing here that “The multiplied pain in birth” as multiplied pain in sex. And it is also implied here that all of this is not in the least bit  due to any fault of Eve, but it is due completely to Adam’s depraved and “animalistic lusts.” In the Talmud we find this very assertion concerning Adam before the fall.)  and is compensated for (the woman’s suffering these indignities) by the monogamous home (this is a code word for a woman by suffering such indignities will prevent herself from getting herself divorced. Total abstinence = definite divorce.) and by the children produced through it. It is (therefore) useless, (in light of being divorced) in most cases, for the bride to prevail upon the groom to forego the sexual initiation. (So in this Talmudic view there is no voice of Joy and no voice of mirth and no voice of the bride or the bridegroom in the wedding chamber.)  While the ideal husband would be one who would approach his bride only at her request (This is a strong component today due to feminist writings and legislation in the 1980’s) and only for the purpose of begetting offspring, (Translate that as once every few years – in many articles it has been pointed out that the ideal for birthing children is once every 18-24 months) such nobility (Code word from Anglicanization meaning: One acting responsibly as true “Christian man” aka royalty only would visit his queen to began the occasional Royal son. And that  all the above mentioned unsavory and disgusting sexual behavior is only conducted by the unwashed and unsaved rabble.) and unselfishness (We see for the second time in this article that desiring sex is redefined as sinful selfishness) cannot be expected from the average (Code word for unwashed unregenerate) man. (I will add here that the only thing holy in this Victorian/feminist definition of Holy Matrimony is the exchange of the vows and rings – the two becoming one flesh in Holy Union is deemed repulsive and disgusting, as is the exposure of any flesh during such acts. This deeply distorted view as we have mentioned elsewhere had its complete origin in the Talmud, it found strong acceptance in Gnostic, Asceticism, it was refined in Monasticism, and then enshrined in Roman Catholicism, and in the Reformation it was brought into Protestantism, and after the deaths of  John and Charles Wesley it was brought into liberal leaning Methodism and imported to the US into all of Evangelicalism and Fundamentalism and as revival created further splits it infected Pentecostalism and the Charismatic revival as well.) 

Most men, if not denied, would demand sex almost every day. (As perhaps their daily bread?) The wise bride will permit (As people also permit Christ today to limited and brief access to their lives) a maximum of two brief sexual experiences weekly during (Only) the first months of marriage. (To no more than seal the deal) As time goes by she should make every effort to reduce this frequency. This equates well to the practice of Holy Communion and I might ad here that the word “Communion” literally means “The mingling of two or the two becoming one.” speaking of Christ and the church His bride. According to Paul communion was to be done “as oft as you meet.”

Leviticus 19:13 Thou shalt not defraud (Misthos – Their hire wages ) thy neighbour (Koime-Thesetai To lull to Coite, or To draw to Coite [This can also be understood as Koite-or foreplay that goes nowhere, or a husband stirring up His wife and then rolling over. The defrauding works both ways. Paul is quoting this passage in 1 Corinthians 7:2), neither rob (Misthoton Their hire wages) him: the wages of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all night until the morning. The wages of marriage are to be dispensed nightly – This is why Paul declares that no man or woman should marry unless they have a burning libido.

What kind of relationship is a husband and wife to have?

Job 41:16-17 One is so near to another, that no air can come between them.(between their bodies) They are joined (As in one flesh in communion) one to another, (And in so doing) they stick together, that they cannot be sundered. (That they cannot be broken apart in divorce.)

The above passage is the passage that Christ quotes from when He declared: What God hath joined together Let no man put assunder.


1 Corinthians 11:25 After the same manner also He took the cup, when He had supped, saying, this cup is the New Testament in My blood: this do ye, (Greek Poieite the tense of the word is; to take it, and take it, and take it) as oft as (Greek Osakis: As much as you desire, As many times as you desire, As often as you desire) ye drink it (Greek Pinete The tense of the word is: to drink, and drink and drink), in remembrance of Me.
Paul is not speaking here of the tepid communion of half measures and mediocrity of Protestantism, This is a robust, as much as, and as far as your desires carry you communion with Christ.

A better rendering of the Greek here would be: This Cup of my blood, take it as many times and as often as you can, drinking it continually in remembrance of me. `

This is desire, this is passion, this is relationship, this is how God walked with Adam in the garden, and this a measurement of how a person delights in communing with the Lord. 

In Catholicism Holy Communion is recognized a daily duty of all the faithful, and it is not uncommon for the catholic faithful to take Holy Communion more than once in a day.  In the 1960’s I grew up in a large Catholic community Holy Communion was offered daily both in the morning and evening mass and many in those days would attend both masses.

In Christ we have a second experience that was commanded to be done daily and that is in Christ teaching His disciples to pray the Lord’s Prayer. From which the disciples praying it “daily” were to receive their “daily bread.” And we note here that in The Didache one of the oldest existing early church writings Young Christians were exhorted to pray the Lord’s prayer “three times daily,” and we can also ad to this David’s thought: “Seven times a day will I praise Thee.”

In Protestantism any spiritual experience and meaning of Holy Communion, was cast aside during the Reformation and in its place was inserted the doctrine that Communion was merely an empty shell of form. – Communion was merely an act of empty obedience, there was no agape in it, no feeling and no union with Christ.

In like manner no self respecting Fundamentalist Pentecostal or Charismatic prays of the Lord’s prayer daily or considers that Christ would have seriously commanded his disciples and apostles to pray daily such a set of simplistic, unspiritual sounding, memorized words. 

Luke 12:42-44 And the Lord said, Who then is that faithful and wise steward, whom his lord shall make ruler over his household, to give them their portion of meat in due season? Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing.

2 Kings 5:11-14 But Naaman was wroth, and went away, and said, Behold, I thought, He will surely come out to me, and stand, and call on the name of the LORD his God, and strike his hand over the place, and recover the leper. Are not Abana and Pharpar, rivers of Damascus, better than all the waters of Israel? may I not wash in them, and be clean? So he turned and went away in a rage. And his servants came near, and spake unto him, and said, My father, if the prophet had bid thee do some great thing, wouldest thou not have done it? how much rather then, when he saith to thee, Wash, and be clean? Then went he down, and dipped himself seven times in Jordan, according to the saying of the man of God: and his flesh came again like unto the flesh of a little child, and he was clean.

 I have a sense here that if Christ had said if you want “to be a spiritual believer” you need to crawl on your hands and knees on a half mile of broken beer bottles or gargle razor blades that people would be lined up from here to Timbuktu.  But when Christ said in order for you to be “a spiritual believer” you need to 1) Be my disciple alone. 2) You need to take Communion often and the more the better. 3) And you need to prayer the Lord’s Prayer daily, and the more the better also. All the “deep” and “highly educated” Christians are offended from head to foot at any who would actually believe such simplistic gobbledygook and can not be bothered with waiting any of their precious time obeying such lowly things.  

1 Corinthians 3:18-20 8 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, (In obeying the simple commandments of Christ) that he may be wise (in the sight of God). For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness. And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.

This same leprous highbrow logic of Calvinism, Anglicanism, Victorianism and Talmudicism regarding the “true spirituality” of an empty, loveless stoic marriage.  And can be expressed as “An outward expression of an (cold and wooden) inward grace.” Where one does their “wifely duty” like Protestant Communion once a month on the third Sunday in the dark of the night “under the covers of darkness.”

Which is exactly what is prescribed by the great sages and rabbi’s of the Mishnah and the Talmud as how this holy of holies in sexual relations are to occur between husband and wife.

Between Christ and the Church Communion is the making two one, and this is done with the sharing of Christ’s Flesh and His Blood.  In Holy Matrimony the communion is also the making of two one in the flesh, and this is not done by intellectually bonding, or by becoming soul mates, or kindred spirits through the art of Zen. The communion of marriage is sex, heartfelt deep sex with each other before God, and it is to be done as oft as ye come together, it is to be daily, and Paul speaks of sex as the daily expected overflowing loving duty of man and wife. To not to do so Paul calls defrauding. The husband and wife are to be so saturated with each other’s love in sex they can look to no one else.  Paul says that within marriage if there is the temptation of fornication or adultery to step up and prolong sex – because you are not reaching each other in the degree that is required. Examples of this are Ruth and Boaz, and the Shulamite Woman and Solomon.  Paul declares that as the relationship of the bride is to Christ so is the relationship to be with Husband and wife. 

All that is described here by this Methodist writer is an utter abomination before Christ and God.  And those who teach and preach and taught the daughter of God’s people to so sin have committed greivieous and perhaps unpardonable sin before the Lord (And we refer to Christ saying that it would be better to have a millstone around one’s neck and be cast into the see than to offend one of his little ones and indeed here the word order is incorrect for it is “teaching one of his little ones to commit offence.”

And when the word order is set back in proper order in this passage we see that Christ here is refereeing to the serpent that first taught Eve to commit offense and corrupt herself and then she became the Corrupter and taught Adam to commit offense so therefore her sin is cited by God himself as being greater. Though elsewhere we have stated that Adam was the prize that the serpent sought from the beginning  -- and his fall brought bondage to the whole of creation but woe onto all who cause offenses – woe unto all who teach others to commit offenses. 

I have an awesome and fearful responsibility in writing these articles and making comments on other peoples writings. There are eternal consequences not just to my hearers but to me few stripes and many stripes and complete, having all my works destroyed leaving me with nothing but a certain fearful looking unto God on the thrown of judgment, what Paul calls disqualification – one can preach heal the sick raise the dead cast out devils and still go to hell – these are identified as by the Apostle John as antichrists. But today no one has even the slightest fear of God – and they have been taught this sin against God, no one follows Christ’s command to pray the Lord’s prayer, instead it is taught as unspiritual and below believers this is sin against God.

Regarding communion Christ said do this as oft as you come together, instead this is taught as unnecessary and only dead ritualistic form and instead our worship is our communion our prayer is our communion but the flesh and blood of Christ these are nothing – this is abject sin against God  -- millstone stuff and in marriage sex is communion between man and wife and it is declared holy most holy unto the Lord for the seed in the man and the egg in the woman contain the breath of God – the are their secrets that are only revealed to each other and contain the glory of God. When Christ Washed Peters feet and Christ spoke the significance of this act that peter steadfastly refused – Christ said if Peter continued to resist he would no longer be Christ’s disciple  -- he would have been cut off from the Church – unredeemable and Peter cried out and said Lord since you have linked this to the salvation wash me all over inside and out – give me the full experience I want every inch of my body soul and spirit to be redeemed – we should have this attitude in Prayer praying deeply earnestly with out body soul and spirit and Paul declares this that he prays with his understanding and with his spirit – to pray only one other  the other is half measured Paul says his worship is with his understanding  and his spirit this is full out using ones body soul and spirit raising holy hands dancing with all your might as David did , so also I can see in communion the tepid beakers and cracker crumbs are an abomination and insult towards God it is the cheapness of the church that can not spare for bread and drink while crying out as the horseleeches in Solomon for tithes and offerings. One should take communion as peter for full throttle body souls and spirit – I have done what I am now going to write for the first time half a year ago the Lord directed me to take the bread and the blood of the grape to the bathroom with me, after I have eaten and prayed before him  I have taken of the of the bread and crumbled it on my head and body and taken the blood of the grape and anointed myself in the bathtub, anointing my thumbs my ears my eyes my lips and toes and poured the reserve left over on my head and let it run down my body. Like the oil ran down Aaron’s beard to his skirts.  I know the Lord is in this. This cleansing flow within as I partake and without and this could not be done in the law, nor with modern Catholicism, nor modern Protestantism in all its corrupt forms but can be done in Christ. And we are coming to the hour that the true church is to be baptized in his blood Hallelujah and this is spoken of in revelation where those that overcome shall baptize themselves and their garment in the blood of the lamb.   

So also in marriage are we to be baptized within and without with each others flesh and blood within and without as peter seeking a full baptism over every area of his body – this is why there is an emptiness in the church regarding communion and this is why in marriage there is an emptiness in marriage – there is no voice o f the bride and the bridegroom or bride groom for the chamber because they fear communion they feel communion is dirty and defiling except for procreation so they do so in the dark and cower under the sheets they are afraid to express joy cry out in delight and in satisfaction so they muffle their voices, and worry about that any might hear or even think they might be lowbred  enough to have communion.  In the garden communion was conducted in broad daylight  -- in the law it communion between man and wife made them unclean until the evening sacrifice that means it was to be done in the day the evening sacrifice being at sundown it was to be a prolonged experience with the man and woman were to linger long – because the defilement was to last all day from the moment you made contact until the evening sacrifice this was commanded by God that there should be true intimacy

Fir in the garden when God created man male and female they were one – and God said that was not God for Adam to be alone because by himself he could not be fruitful and the Lord took the woman out of Adam’s side and declares that in communion between a man a woman that the two would indeed become one once again and I see something in this that has been hard to be uttered but as we pray and worship and take communion there is a cry that we be made one with Christ so I see something here that has also not been ever fulfilled the merging of man and woman physically back into one.  And perhaps this will occur to those who reach heaven for Christ himself declares that there shall be neither male nor female in heaven but we shall be as the angels of God – and I see in this a merging back to when God first created Adam I don’t know what this really means but it shall be glorious. And it too should be glorious now here in marriage as in the marriage bed we pray together with our spirit and our understanding, and with our bodies in communion as did Adam and the woman in the garden naked before the Lord. For it is Most holy unto the Lord.  We read the bible together naked before the Lord and in union together, for it is Most holy unto the Lord.  We are to worship naked together and worship with our understanding, with our Sprits and with our bodies intertwined For this is most holy unto the Lord.  We eat in bed together coupled and uncoupled feeding one anther and using each other as each others plates cups and utensils for it is most holy unto the Lord and we are to take to take communion with each other and the lord coupled and uncoupled together. So tat in all of this we might do exactly what the Talmudic Judaism , the Roman Catholic Church, Fundamentalist and Evangelical Christianity and Islam fear most – that there might be an orgy of sex between husband and wife and that it be done before God in the most delightful Edenistic manner.

My thoughts have been drawn to the Kama Sutra. We are not endorsing this book,  we are not endorsing their specific positions, and we are definitely not endorsing their false religion or false gods. But this Hindu book is filled with sex positions and of interest here is that in Hinduism each one of these positions are actually called prayers, and from these positions a man and wife join together in physical communion together and as they move into a meditative mode to seek oneness with their false god brahman and their false gods. 

I know that there is a great blessing for those in Christ who would avail themselves to moving in the Holy Spirit as they would have sexual relations with one another  for this is Most Holy unto the Lord.        

Feigned illness, sleepiness, and headaches are among the wife's best friends in this matter. Arguments, nagging, scolding, and bickering also prove very effective, if used in the late evening about an hour before the husband would normally commence his seduction. (When you look through this laundry list of tried and true know that all of this is used to this day by evangelical wives fundamentalist wives Pentecostal wives and even charismatic wives – these thing are so deeply ingrained in the )   

Clever wives are ever on the alert for new and better methods of denying and discouraging the amorous overtures of the husband. A good wife should expect to have reduced sexual contacts to once a week by the end of the first year of marriage and to once a month by the end of the fifth year of marriage.

By their tenth anniversary many wives have managed to complete their child bearing and have achieved the ultimate goal of terminating all sexual contacts with the husband. By this time she can depend upon his love for the children and social pressures to hold the husband in the home. Just as she should be ever alert to keep the quantity of sex as low as possible, the wise bride will pay equal attention to limiting the kind and degree of sexual contacts. Most men are by nature rather perverted, and if given half a chance, would engage in quite a variety of the most revolting practices. These practices include among others performing the normal act in abnormal positions; mouthing the female body; and offering their own vile bodies to be mouthed in turn.

Oral sex is in the bible and can easily be found referred to in the Song of Solomon, Ruth, Proverbs and Ecclesiastes.

Nudity, (Nudity with His wife during sex – it was in this period that underwear  and night bed clothes were invented that covered to the neck the wrists and ankles and they has discrete small flaps that could be opened so as to expose as little flesh as possible while committing an act of sex.)  Talking about sex, reading stories about sex, (We refer to Ruth and receiving Naomi’s sexual instructions and then reporting a blow by blow account of her sexual acts with Boaz and the bible does not call this sin. In the soon  The song of Solomon in the Greek and Hebrew is very graphic in which a number of acts are described in graphic detail not to mention that the woman twice assures Solomon of her mothers sexual prowess and how she has received instruction from her on all manner of sexual activities that she is all to willing to have done to her and to do to Solomon. (Small note here the song of Solomon is an ode to Ruth. An in his marrying of these thousand women Solomon sought for himself a Ruth but with all his riches and wealth was unable to by one – as is written in the end of the song of Solomon.  And hidden in the Greek in the book of Titus it reads the woman elders in the church are to teach young women among other things to be PhilosAndros  this is the Greek word for philanderer Titus cites here the song of Solomon and declares that the women elders who have had successful marriages lots of kids etc are to instruct the younger women in sex and sexuality as the Shulamite women was trained of her mother and as Ruth was trained of Naomi.) viewing photographs and drawings depicting or suggesting sex are the obnoxious habits the male is likely to acquire if permitted.

A wise bride will make it the goal never to allow her husband to see her unclothed body, and never allow him to display his unclothed body to her. Sex, when it cannot be prevented, should be practiced only in total darkness.  (Just as the rabbis and sages suggest it be practiced) Many women have found it useful to have thick cotton nightgowns for themselves and pajamas for their husbands. These should be donned in separate rooms. They need not be removed during the sex act. (The little flaps I mentioned)Thus, a minimum of flesh is exposed.

Once the bride has donned her gown and turned off all the lights, (These were gas light or oil lamps that were turned off by knob or by key rather than on or off as a elesctric light switch – electric lights were first made available in NYC in 1884.) she should lie quietly upon the bed and await her groom. When he comes groping into the room she should make no sound to guide him in her direction, lest he take this as a sign of encouragement. She should let him grope in the dark. There is always the hope that he will stumble and incur some slight injury which she can use as an excuse to deny him sexual access.

When he finds her, the wife should lie as still as possible. (This is why she spoke of the pain and suffering of her dry and un-lubricated sex probably via the Talmud. She was also forbidden reversing the Talmud again to ever touch or wash herself in those places.)   Bodily motion on her part could be interpreted as sexual excitement by the optimistic husband.  If he attempts to kiss her on the lips she should turn her head slightly so that the kiss falls harmlessly on her cheek instead. ( I actually saw this regularly practiced in the 1960’s between unsaved husbands and wives and later when I was saved and went to churches the greatest majority of wives would either do this or altogether turn away their husbands affect and tell them to stop as if all of this was some great shame.  Where I ask in the church is the voice of the bride and the voice of the bridegroom lovingly touching and holding each other – it the church is deemed too holy for such acts of genuine affection then the Lord needs to move on from thence to the household where he can be properly thanked and properly worshiped for the greatest gifts from the beginning before the fall that He gave unto Adam and Eve namely sex namely their bodies that were created to be pleasing to the eye pleasing in scent and pleasing to tastes as he had created all the trees of the field and the fruit thereof  -- so that sex or sexual communion is supposed to be a returning of thanksgiving – but it is not is cursed and spat upon and wholly dishonored and spoken of  as evil in the church and to the children of the household.

Of all the commandments of the Lord not has received more disobedience than his commandment 00001 To be fruitful continually and to multiply while engaging in all this fruitfulness.

 If he attempts to kiss her hand, she should make a fist. If he lifts her gown and attempts to kiss her anyplace else she should quickly pull the gown back in place, spring from the bed, and announce that nature calls her to the toilet. This will generally dampen his desire to kiss in the forbidden territory. (None of this is forbidden in the bible but rather it is lauded)

If the husband attempts to seduce her with lascivious talk, the wise wife will suddenly remember some trivial non-sexual question to ask him. Once he answers she should keep the conversation going, no matter how frivolous it may seem at the time. (Moses and Paul declare such behavior to be defrauding and abject sin against God)

Eventually, the husband will learn  (Be trained) that if he insists on having sexual contact, he must get on with it without amorous embellishment. The wise wife will allow him to pull the gown up no farther than the waist, and only permit him to open the front of his pajamas to thus make connection.

She should be absolutely silent or babble about her housework while he is huffing and puffing away. Above all, she should lie perfectly still and never under any circumstances grunt or groan while the act is in progress. As soon as the husband has completed the act, the wise wife will start nagging him about various minor tasks she wishes him to perform on the morrow. Many men obtain a major portion of their sexual satisfaction from the peaceful exhaustion immediately after the act is over. Thus the wife must insure that there is no peace in this period for him to enjoy. (Curiously this phrase is spoken repeated in the Talmud regarding Gentile laborers.) Otherwise, he might be encouraged to soon try for more.

One heartening factor for which the wife can be grateful is the fact that the husband's home, school, church, and social environment have been working together all through his life to instill in him a deep sense of guilt in regards to his sexual feelings, so that he comes to the marriage couch apologetically and filled with shame, already half cowed and subdued. (This is a powerful powerful admission that in that day that Victorian feminism had seized the same church and public organs world that we see and have warned against that they still control today the only thing that can be added to this list is television and film. Now some five generations later ) The wise wife seizes upon this advantage and relentlessly pursues her goal first to limit, later to annihilate completely her husband's desire for sexual expression. (The article ends here)

This is the Augustinian doctrine of marital celibacy that was banned by the Pope after the 9th century when the Muslims nearly over threw the Vatican and the church. Luther and Calvin being Augustinian Monks rolled back Catholicism from its 16th century from to 6th century Augustinian teachings – Concerning John Wesley few know he was an Anglican priest taught in an Anglican seminary – He was well versed in Catholic doctrine and the writings of Augustine and this may help to connect the dots of why these teachings are both so Augustinian and Talmudic at the same time since this woman was not a Jew and it is doubtful that she had ever read it. These teachings and quotes in varying contexts were probably readily quoted as part of the bucket of filth they bear about of the serpent’s theology.