16-year-old high school student Jennifer Rankin fully intended to unite her
voicelessness with that of the unborn as part of the annual Pro-Life Day of
Silent Solidarity when she arrived at school yesterday, reports Bill Henry of
Sun Media, reports Patrick B. Craine, LifeSiteNews.com.
She
was impeded, however, by her school principal, who stated that the right to free
speech does not apply on school property and who forced Rankin to remain in
isolation for the entire day as long as she participated in the event.
During
the annual Day of Silent Solidarity international campaign, which is organized
by Stand True Ministries, students don red bands on their arms and red duct
tape on their mouths, remaining silent while passing out fliers about the
atrocity of abortion.
Rankin,
16, arrived at
"I
was taken directly into a small room that was opposite the vice-principal's
office and I was in there all day," Rankin told Sun Media. "I wasn't
allowed to speak with or see any other students and students were not allowed
to come and see me and I was isolated in that room for the entire day."
While
Cavan had informed students in advance that their pro-life witness would not be
allowed, Rankin insists that her Charter right to free expression was
infringed. "I felt very discriminated by it," she said. "I don't
think it was right at all what happened."
Several
students had joined her in the event last year, but this time Rankin was alone.
"I think a lot of people got scared and backed out," she said.
"I would like to have the ability to correct this. I don't think it should
be just left alone."
The
youth pastor at Rankin's church, Ken Holley, expressed disappointment and
insisted that the school's actions violated her rights. "It's a day of
silence and basically they lose their voice for those that never had a
voice," he said. "It's pro-life. There's no arguing. They can't talk
all day. They just stay silent and if anybody asks why they're silent they hand
out a little sheet that says this is why."
"I
guess I am disappointed that they're not allowed to have a voice, or not have a
voice, actually," he said.
Cavan,
who did not return a message left by LifeSiteNews.com, told Sun Media that the
right to free speech does not apply on school property. "School property
is not a public place," she said. "So while absolutely we support the
right to free speech in a public space, that's not school property." She
said that school policy prohibits the dissemination of one-sided information on
religious, political, or other issues that are controversial.
Pastor
Holley pointed out that the school does an annual 'Gay Pride' day "where
everybody wears pink shirts," and that the school allows nude pictures on
the wall to stand as 'art'. "My students have to go to school and deal
with that," he said, "and as soon as they try to stand up for
anything, it's like, well, just be quiet, go home. I don't think that's
right."
Cavan
maintains that the 'Gay Pride' event is a different issue because it is about
fighting homophobia and supporting rights guaranteed in the Charter. Jennifer
Rankin's cause, however, "is not an issue under human rights," Cavan
said. "It's an ethical/moral decision and everyone has the right to their
view, absolutely. And I commend the students for their personal views and their
desire to share their beliefs. I just want to assure that every student feels
supported when those beliefs are shared."
Mary-Ellen
Douglas of Campaign Life Coalition expressed dismay that the school shut down
Rankin's message. "You would think a school, as a facility of education,
would be the place where free speech would flourish, not the opposite,"
she said. Regarding the school's 'Gay Pride' day, she said, "There's only
one side on that one, I guess, too, eh? They're just trying to make sure that
the truth doesn't get out."
David
Cortman, senior legal counsel with the Alliance Defence Fund, told LSN that
"the school should be ashamed of its hypocrisy."
"On
the one hand, the school first of all is apparently picking and choosing which
parts of the Charter that it wants to comply with," he said. "It
hides behind the Charter to justify its blatant promotion of the homosexual
agenda, while at the same time it ignores the students' rights to free expression
under the Charter."
"In
my opinion, the policy and their actions, violate the Charter," he
continued. "If homosexual behaviour is a human right, even more so is life
itself a human right. ... I think it's just another instance of government indoctrination
that's aimed at the suppression of religious speech."