Government's Big Behavioral Science
Experiment
Friday, July 31,
2009
This is a rush transcript
from "Glenn Beck," July 30, 2009. This copy may not be in its final
form and may be updated.
GLENN BECK, HOST: Hey, for all you lab geeks out there,
you're going to be excited to know that the government is gearing up to conduct
one of the biggest scientific experiments ever and you get to be a part of it.
It's
called H.R. 3247. It's a bill proposed by Congressman Brian Baird.
It
seeks to, and I quote: "Establish social and behavioral science research
programs. They would seek to identify and understand social and behavioral
factors that influence energy consumption, to promote the utilization of the
results of social and behavioral research to improve the design, development
and demonstration and application of energy technologies policies and
programs."
Oh,
this is fantastic. Remember the book "1984"? Sure. It's nothing like
that. Really, this is completely different.
There'll
also be a director of social and behavioral research. Oh man, I doubt if it
will be, you know, like anybody with crazy beliefs, you know, like every other
"czar." This one is going to be totally just like you.
•
Video: Watch Beck's interview
They're
going to study us and find ways to essentially trick us into driving crappy
hybrids and I bet that's just the beginning. As Time magazine summarized on
April 2: "The president — President Obama is still relying on behavioral
science. But now, his administration is using it to try to transform the
country" — they didn't say this like it was a bad thing, either —
"because when you know what makes people tick, it's a lot easier to help
them change."
Well,
that doesn't sound creepy at all. It doesn't.
And
interestingly enough, it doesn't sound very American, either. But what is that
now that we're in a global community? When has that ever stopped Barack Obama
before? I mean, hey, if it's for the betterment of the collective — you know
what I'm saying?
Joining me now is
Congressman Dana Rohrabacher of
Congressman,
you were one of the guys that were actually, really fighting against this bill
yesterday. What — what in
REP. DANA ROHRABACHER, R-CALIF.: Well, this exemplifies
something that has been happening underneath the surface. Rarely do you get
someone as honest as Brian Baird and as sincere as he is, explaining the real
purpose behind his bill, which is behavior modification.
So,
he wants to set up a behavior modification "czar" at the Department
of Energy. You know, we Republicans feel government is supposed to be
controlled by the people, and obviously, the frame of mind that comes from this
bill is: The government should control the people.
BECK: Well, I'm just thinking, gosh, Congressman, some might say this
sounds like — oh, I don't know — propaganda.
ROHRABACHER: Well, that is exactly what they intend and, actually, I
think the word was used in the debate. They believe that people just aren't
doing the right things, because they're not making choices that these liberal
leftists want them to make, and thus, there must be something wrong with them.
BECK: Sure.
ROHRABACHER: Let's psychoanalyze them.
BECK: They're insane.
ROHRABACHER: And, this is — this is as arrogant as it comes. And I will
tell you, and Brian is a very nice guy, he is well intended, but you know what
the people who put us on the road with all good intentions, they can put us on
the road to you know where.
BECK: I'm going to say it — hell or
ROHRABACHER: That's right.
BECK: One of the two.
Help
me out with this one. This is what Representative Baird said —
he said: "We are not only going to unleash psychiatrists on you, it's
going to be anthropologists and economists and psychologists. This is vicious,
freedom-grabbing mind control at its most pernicious. And I think we should
desperately hide in fear, because without a doubt, the Martians and the
communists are right behind."
He
was mocking anyone who had a problem with a behavioral research czar and
propaganda — mocking.
ROHRABACHER: That's right. Well, the trouble with this debate was
— and by the way, it was passed by party-line vote: All of the Democrats voted
for it; all the Republicans voted against it. But you can't tell when they're
being facetious or not.
You
heard some people there making arguments that, "We have to tell our
children whether or not to turn the lights on and off." Well, you know, we
— our retort was, you don't treat the American people like children. Children
shouldn't have all the rights and make independent decisions. But adults in
this country don't deserve to be sent to a psychiatrist if they disagree with
some little liberal guru.
BECK: OK. Thank you very much, Congressman. You keep up the good fight.