Gov Charlie Crist Named in The Film Outrage as Gay
The
Feed
May 8 2009
From Tactics in the Past
these charges will no doubt prove to be true.
What is really amazing about this is that this film and information dump
coming out now is against a number of Republican Moderates. Which the democrats have been wining and
dining to get them to create a rift in the Republican party
and war against conservatives.
Of interest also is Senator
Arlen Spector that was promised the sun moon and
stars if he Converted to the Democrat party since his conversion he has been
denied all he was promised and the latest news and weather is now MoveOn-dot-Org has declared he is unfit to be a democrat
and have vowed to take him out in his re-election bid in his district.
Things are happening, and
not all of them are bad. We see 2010 as
a time of great great opportunity for renewal in this
land as the throw “The Throw bums out” mentality rises in the public and there
is no national leadership seen on the Republican side in the senate and the
house, this is the time for doctors,
farmers, business men and common citizens to run for senate and house positions
to return this nation to its roots with citizen legislators instead of the
Cabal of Corrupt Lawyers which have run this nation into the dirt for the last
five decades.
IT IS TIME TO PRAY SCRIPTURALLY THAT WE BE GIVEN GODLY BELIEVERS
As Florida Gov. Charlie Crist considers whether to enter the competitive
race to replace Sen. Mel Martinez, some public talk has turned
to the issue of his sexuality, thanks to Outrage, an independent film
focused on politicians who are accused of hiding their sexual orientation.
During this appearance on an
The newschannels' segment
featured blogger Mike Rogers, whose blogActive
site features similar reports on political figures, and host Doug McKelway in a heated argument that distracts from
some key questions which deserve an answer:
Does the movie make a strong case for its allegations
against each subject, and were the subjects given a chance to respond?
Is it ethical to reveal a politician's private sexual
orientation, just because someone feels their policies are anti-gay?
Is there a difference between a politician who does not
reveal his/her sexual orientation and a politician who creates a public image
different than his/her private life?
Is it fair to a require a politician who may be gay or
bisexual to publicly acknowledge their sexual orientation when they are
involved with legislation impacting gay or bisexual issues?
I'm not sure how I feel about these issues; there seem to
be strong arguments on both sides. Making all this tougher to navigate is the
GOP's longstanding demonization of gay people in
electoral politics and the damage a politician can receive just by having
his/her name included in these discussions.