By Max Davidson
Published: 7:00AM BST 25 Aug 2009
Traditional lightbulbs are soon to be banned Photo: Getty
If you have missed this story, it
is probably because you have been reading your daily newspaper in such poor
light that you have given up the struggle.
Since January 1 this year, when
leading retailers announced a voluntary ban on stocking traditional 100-watt
incandescent light bulbs, those glorious domestic globes with their
Rubens-esque curves, the lights have been going out all over
From September 1, shops will no
longer be able to buy incandescent opaque light bulbs, which will be banned
across the European Union, with the objective of slashing energy bills and
carbon dioxide emissions.
It is a noble ambition, in tune
with the environmentally-conscious Zeitgeist. Tony Blair probably felt a
100-watt glow of pride as he and his fellow heads of government waved through
the proposal at a European Council meeting in March 2007. But the
implementation of the new EU directive looks set to cause a worse headache than
reading the Encyclopaedia Britannica by candlelight.
How many people even know about
the ban? And will all shopkeepers apply it with equal rigour? We are in for one
of those periods of retail chaos that seem to originate in
In
And I don't mind admitting that,
in matters of light-bulb morality, I am on a par with the Germans. On Saturday,
I nipped out to the shops to buy replacement pearl bulbs while stocks last. I
will give way eventually, change to the new CFLs, do
my bit for the environment. I just don't see why I should read my morning paper
lit by something that looks like a lavatory U-bend. It's too depressing.
"There is a certain amount
of consumer resistance to CFLs," says Lizzie Ruffles, of the consumer magazine
Which?. "People think – wrongly, on the
evidence – that the new bulbs are less bright than conventional ones. New
technology always worries people – very similar concerns were expressed when we
moved from gas lamps to electricity. The main weakness of the CFLs, which we
have surveyed, is not their brightness but the fact that they start to dim
sooner than their manufacturers say they will."
In terms of energy saving, the
case for the new lights is compelling. Government figures suggest that a typical
home will save £37 a year on electricity bills by installing low-energy
fluorescent and halogen bulbs, while national carbon emissions will be slashed
by an estimated five million tons a year. The new CFLs, which cost around £3
each and in theory last six or seven years, use about a fifth of the energy of
a conventional bulb.
"The new bulbs will help you
save money and energy," says Paula Owen of the Energy Savings Trust.
"And by saving energy, you'll be helping to fight climate change,
too."
A survey by the Trust found that
half the people questioned could not tell the difference between the
traditional bulbs and the new energy-efficient ones. But, unfortunately, I am
not one of them. There is a difference, and it devalues the argument to
skate over it.
Aesthetically, many of the CFLs I
have seen are too hideous for words. Compared with the warm glow of traditional
100-watt bulbs, they give off such a cold, unnatural light that the overall
effect is incredibly dispiriting, like a mortuary or a cheap tanning salon.
What is the point of saving the planet if we are all going to turn into zombies
as a result of the dehumanising quality of our lit environment?
The irony is that, during the
period in which we have all become more aware of the importance of energy
conservation, many of us have also become much more picky
about the lamps we buy. An Italian chandelier here, a glass
wall-light there, a concealed spotlight there. We light up the domestic
comedy of our lives in loving detail. We are aesthetes as well as eco-warriors.
With luck, we will be able to
muddle through, and eventually come up with light bulbs that are both
energy-efficient and visually pleasing. But we may have to endure some fairly
grim lighting during the transitional period – not to mention wasting time,
energy and money buying state-of-the-art light fittings that refuse to go into
the sockets for which the shopkeeper insisted they were designed.