EDITORIAL
Reckless Endangerment for Breathing
New EPA ruling could suffocate job growth
Hey, you over there, stop
breathing so much. You're endangering the rest of us.
Or at least that's what the
Environmental Protection Agency would have you believe. The EPA officially
ruled yesterday that carbon dioxide (CO2) is a dangerous pollutant subject to
government regulation even without benefit of new legislation. CO2 is, of
course, what animals and people exhale with every breath, after inhaling oxygen.
The EPA hastens to add that
its CO2 "endangerment" ruling is aimed only at organizations that
emit more than 250 tons of CO2 a year, not at ordinary people. But that's cold
comfort. Common-sense limitations on regulations have a way of evaporating into
thin air when the bureaucratic state starts ruling by administrative fiat. The
EPA in recent years has become known for sending armed SWAT-type teams into
small businesses for relatively minor enforcement actions. Indeed, businesses,
both large and small, are likely to suffer drastically from the EPA's decision.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce
warned that the ruling "could result in a top-down command-and-control
regime that will choke off growth by adding new mandates to virtually every
major construction and renovation project." The National Association of
Manufacturers likewise blasted the decision, and political and think-tank
leaders warned of massive job losses because of it.
What might be even worse is
what trial lawyers make of the ruling. As explained a year ago by
The timing of the EPA's
ruling is manifestly a political play meant to coincide with the
Congress, not the EPA,
should decide whether to impose such drastic new rules on the struggling