Court Homosexual Rights Trump Religious Freedom
One News Now ^ | August 19, 2008 | Jeff Johnson
Posted on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 5:38:34 PM
The same California Supreme Court that created a "right" to homosexual "marriage" earlier this year has now ruled that the state may force healthcare professionals to provide services that support an immoral and physically dangerous lifestyle.
"This is a clear violation of the fundamental
rights of individuals to live and practice their faith," he states
bluntly. "Forcing doctors to have to choose between being a doctor and
being a Christian in the State of
In the case in question, the Christian doctors refused to perform artificial insemination on a lesbian patient, but did refer her to another doctor who would perform the elective treatment. Dacus says that proves this suit was not about guaranteeing "healthcare" for homosexuals, but instead about punishing Christians for obeying God's Word.
"This is not about denying people services," the attorney argues. "This is, instead, about the 'thought police' attempting to censor Christian beliefs and Christian perspectives that don't agree with homosexuality. We're talking...about individuals being able to force doctors or other professionals to violate their faith in order to keep their job." And that, he adds, is a clear violation of the rights of individuals to be able to practice their expertise and, at the same time, not to have to deny their faith.
The PJI president says the ruling is quite broad and will apply to almost every profession in the state, meaning that Christian professionals and service providers -- childcare providers, for instance -- will be forced to provide services to homosexuals that support their immoral lifestyle and clearly violate biblical standards.
"For example, lawyers who are engaging in marriage and family law can now be forced to [execute] documents for homosexuals adopting children...," Dacus offers. "And individual with a wedding service, despite their Christian faith to the contrary, can now be forced to conduct wedding services and wedding preparations for lesbian or homosexual male couples."
Dacus says the case is certain to be appealed. "This just
goes to show how critically important it is for us in the United States to have
a Supreme Court that is not against those who practice the Christian faith but,
instead, understands what the Constitution is about and [do] not engage in
outrageous judicial activism," he says.
Lesbians' desires trump doctors' religious rights