A Turning Tide in Europe
as Islam Gains Ground
By
DWIGHT GARNER
Published:
July 29, 2009
Christopher
Caldwell’s “Reflections on the Revolution in Europe:
Immigration, Islam, and the West” is a hot book presented under a cool,
scholarly title. To observe that Mr. Caldwell’s rhetoric is “hot” is not to say
that it is aggrieved or unruly. On the contrary, Mr. Caldwell, a senior editor
at The Weekly Standard and a columnist for The Financial Times, compiles his
arguments patiently, twig by twig, and mostly with lucidity and intellectual
grace and even wit.
But
they are arguments one is not used to hearing put so baldly, at least from the
West’s leading political journalists. Primary among them are these: Through decades
of mass immigration to Europe’s hospitable cities and because of a strong
disinclination to assimilate, Muslims are changing the face of Europe, perhaps decisively. These Muslim immigrants are
not so much enhancing European culture as they are supplanting it. The products
of an adversarial culture, these immigrants and their religion, Islam, are
“patiently conquering Europe’s cities, street
by street.”
Mr.
Caldwell is a vivid writer, and like an action-movie hero he walks calmly away
from his own detonations while fire swirls behind him. “Imagine that the West,
at the height of the Cold War, had received a mass inflow of immigrants from
Communist countries who were ambivalent about which side they supported,” he
writes. “Something similar is taking place now.”
Muslim
cultures “have historically been Europe’s
enemies, its overlords, or its underlings,” he deposes. “Europe
is wagering that attitudes handed down over the centuries, on both sides, have
disappeared, or can be made to disappear. That is probably not a wise wager.”
These
kinds of ideas have been articulated before, of course, by writers including
the Princeton Islamic scholar Bernard Lewis — who has
said that, by the end of this century, “Europe will be part of the Arabic west,
of the Maghreb” — the Somali-born Dutch feminist Ayaan Hirsi Ali (“Infidel”),
Lee Harris (“The Suicide of Reason”), Bruce Bawer (“While Europe Slept”) and
the combustible journalist Oriana Fallaci. But Mr. Caldwell’s book is the most
rigorous and plainspoken examination of Muslim immigration in Europe to date, a
sobering book that walks right up to, if never quite crossing, the line between
being alarming and being alarmist.
There
are many strains to Mr. Caldwell’s argument, too many
to fully tease out here. Suffice it to say, up front, that Mr. Caldwell is not
anti-immigration. He traces the historical movements of various peoples across
continents and nationalities and notes both successes and failures. But there
has been nothing, he suggests, quite like the recent influx of Muslims into Europe — he refers to it as “a rupture in its history.”
“In the middle of
the 20th century, there were virtually no Muslims in Western
Europe,” Mr. Caldwell writes. “At the turn of the 21st, (As of the
year 2000) there were between 15 and 17 million
Muslims in Western Europe, including 5 million in France, 4 million in Germany,
and 2 million in Britain.”
These
immigrants are further swamping Europe
demographically, he adds, because of their high fertility rates. He points to
small facts as well as large ones. In Brussels
in 2006, the seven most common given boys’ names “were Mohamed, Adam, Rayan,
Ayoub, Mehdi, Amine, and Hamza.” (In 2007 Mohammed was the #1 birth name with a mere 2
million Muslims vs 40 million British)
The
problem, in Mr. Caldwell’s view, is less about sheer numbers than cultural
divergence. What’s happening in Europe is not
the creation of an American-style melting pot, he writes, because Muslims are
not melting in. They are instead forming what he calls “a parallel society.”
Newcomers to England
now listen to Al Jazeera, not the BBC. They are hesitant to serve
in their adopted country’s militaries. (As of 2007, Mr. Caldwell notes, there
were only 330 Muslims in Britain’s
armed forces.) Worse, these immigrants are bringing anti-Semitism back to Europe.
Mr.
Caldwell carefully observes the riots that spread in ethnic neighborhoods
across France
in 2005, during which thousands of cars were burned. “Who were these rioters?”
he asks. “Were they admirers of France’s majority culture,
frustrated at not being able to join it on equal terms? Or did they
simply aspire to burn to the ground a society they despised, whether for its
exclusivity, its hypocrisy, or its weakness?”
(Article
Continues at NYTIMES ONLINE)